|
§
CULPEPER,
Nicholas (1616–1654).
The English physitian enlarged: with three hundred, sixty, and nine
medicines made of English herbs that were not in any impression until
this: The epistle wil inform you how to know this impression from any
other. Being an astrologo-physical discourse of the vulgar herbs of this
nation: containing a compleat method of physick, whereby a man may
preserve his body in health; or cure himself, being sick, for three pence
charge, with such things only as grow in England, they being most fit for
English bodies. Herein is also shewed these seven things, viz. 1 The way
of making plaisters, oyntments, oyls, pultisses, syrups, decoctions,
julips, or waters, of al sorts of physical herbs, that you may have them
ready for your use at al times of the yeer. 2 What planet governeth every
herb or tree (used in physick) that groweth in England. 3 The time of
gathering al herbs, both vulgarly, and astologically[sic]. 4 The way of
drying and keeping the herbs al the yeer. 5 The way of keeping their
juyces ready for use at al times. 6 The way of making and keeping al kind
of useful compounds made of herbs. 7 The way of mixing medicines according
to cause and mixture of the disease, and part of the body afflicted. By
Nich. Culpeper, Gent. student in physick and astrologie: living in Spittle
Fields.
London: printed by Peter Cole in Leaden-Hall, and are to be sold
at his shop at the sign of the Printing-press in Cornhil, neer the Royal
Exchange, 1653.
Collation:
8vo: B4 (–B1) C8 (–C8) D–M8 Q–2A8
2B–2C4, 162 of 164 leaves, pp. [20] 398 [i.e. 288 174–283
omitted] [16]. LACKING B1, BLANK EXCEPT FOR PRINTER’S DEVICE ON VERSO,
AND C8, A LONGITUDINAL HALF-TITLE. Title within a border of fleurons.
Plates:
Possibly lacking a portrait, although none is called for in the references
cited.
Condition:
168 x 105mm. A small copy, orners of title defective affecting the border
and the title backed with tissue, portions of H5 and I5 torn away with
loss of text (perhaps 20 words in all) and repaired; headlines cropped;
2B4 frayed with loss of several letters in the corners; many other leaves
frayed with loss of a few letters at line ends and in catchwords; light
waterstaining and soiling.
Binding:
Rebound in a pair of old boards with new calf spine. Early engraved
portrait of Culpeper mounted as a frontispiece.
Provenance:
A few early annotations, fists and underlining in ink and pencil and
additions to the index; signature ‘Wm. King’ dated 1823 on verso of
title; Edwin Clarke (1919–1996).
References:
Wing C7502; ESTC R19808
(pagination omits B1); Krivatsy 2964 (pagination omits B1 and C8);
Sanderson E.3. (b); Henrey 57.
Price:
£1,200
Second authorised edition, enlarged (first 1652; there were also two
piracies, one in two issues, in the same year). In ‘To the reader’
Culpeper states that it is published on 5 September; the Thomason copy is
annotated 29 August. This copy is of the same setting as the Thomason
copy; Sanderson also describes another setting, E. 3. (a), with the
printer’s device on the verso of the title and different pagination
(copies at Wellcome and BL 988.a.7).
¶
The most popular of all English herbals: over a 100 editions have been
issued and it is still in print. Pultney wrote in 1790 that ‘of the
astrological herbalists, Nicholas Culpepper stands eminently forward. His
"Herball", first printed in 1652, which continued for more than
a century, to be the manual of good ladies in the country, is well drawn
up with a clearness and distinction that would not have disgraced a better
pen’; and in 1947 Mrs C. F. Leyel, founder of the Culpeper shops wrote
in her new edition of the herbal: ‘Most of the herbs described by
Nicholas Culpeper... are used by herbalists to-day for the same purposes’
(both quoted by Henrey).
The first edition was a folio, published in 1652 and almost immediately
pirated in duodecimo format, pocketable and more useful as a field guide.
In producing his own small format edition, ‘with very many Additions to
every Sheet in the Book’, Culpeper was obliged to denounce the piracy
which he says is ‘very falsly printed; there being usually twenty or
thirty gross mistakes in every sheet, many of them such as are exceeding
dangerous to such as shal venture to use them’. He gives directions for
distinguishing the edition in hand from the piracy of the first edition,
the third of which is that ‘The true one is in Octavo, of a
bigger Letter than the counterfet one, which is in Twelves, of the
Letter smal Bibles use to be printed on.’ (The piracy appeared in two
issues, in one with the imprint of William Bentley and in the other ‘printed
for the commonwealth of England, another edition with the latter imprint,
even worse printed, Henrey calls a counterfeit of the piracy).
This copy, now in very poor condition, was evidently consulted
regularly by an early, possibly the first, owner. There are marks and
pointing fists in the text, and annotations to the index, both additional
page numbers and a few additional headings, including ‘Yard standing’
– the reference is to Culpeper’s use of Hemlock to treat ‘Priapismus,
or continual standing of the Yard’ (underlined in the text on p. 123).
Literature:
Poynter 6.
|